Home > Beer > Citralogy: Fyne Ales Jarl v Oakham Citra v BrewDog IPA Is Dead Citra v Mikkeller Citra IPA

Citralogy: Fyne Ales Jarl v Oakham Citra v BrewDog IPA Is Dead Citra v Mikkeller Citra IPA

Like my black IPA experiment recently, this post is born of finding I had accumulated a few beers of a single type and thought they were worth comparing.  In addition, this post is dedicated to Chris “Citra” King, a man unafraid to call a bandwagon a bandwagon.

Fyne Ales Jarl 3.8%

Prior knowledge:  A much-praised Scottish session ale which uses Citra.  I don’t know if it’s solely Citra-hopped, but don’t know for sure if there are other hops used and what they are.

Smell: Light, slightly bready but also lemon and slighty white-wine grapey aroma.  Kate thought she detected Nelson Sauvin, and I agree.

Appearance: Very pale straw colour, pale white head.

Taste: Quite a thin body but with a noticeable hint of oiliness in the mouthfeel.  Delicate fresh lemon citrus and grape flavours and a slightly alkaline bitterness.

Conclusion:  I got a lot more Nelson Sauvin in the flavour than Citra, but this is a really nice light session beer.  I do wonder if it’s a different experience on cask and more fuller bodied.   I’ve been told that Hawkshead’s excellent and similarly light, low ABV Citra-led Windermere Pale is not bottled, as they’re not convinced the hop flavours will hold up.  Nevertheless an accessible and sensible beer that I increasingly find myself reaching for in the fridge.

Oakham Citra 4.6%

Prior knowledge:  An early adopter of Citra in the UK.

Smell: Not huge, again a little bready and a little lemony.

Appearance: More golden colour, similarly pale white head.

Taste: More assertively bitter in a slightly chalky, grapefruity manner.  Lacking sweetness and body.

Conclusion:  The label mentions gooseberry, grapefruit and lychee in the aroma and that’s not far off in respect of the taste, at least.  Again this is a very nice beer, but not an immediately compelling mix of flavours.  Once again, I think this would most likely be a better beer on cask.

BrewDog IPA Is Dead Citra 7.5%

Prior knowledge: 75 IBU Citra-hopped IPA from BrewDog’s interesting single hop experiment “IPA Is Dead”, which involved four beers with identical IBUs and ABVs, the only difference being the type of hop used. I reviewed each of the beers after trying them at the North Bar launch night here.  On keg it wasn’t my favourite of the four, but others preferred it.

Smell: Rich sweet malty mango aroma.

Appearance: The shade is clearly that of a maltier beer, a different class to the previous session-strengthers.

Taste: Sweet sticky mango and lime taste, with a very sweet to cloying aftertaste.

Conclusion: I suspect the hops have calmed down a bit since the keg version I had in North, this bottle being a few months old now.  I think it lacked depth, but was still a very nice beer.

Mikkeller Citra IPA 6.8%

Prior knowledge:
From a much wider single-hop experiment (see Malt Jerry’s post here), I bought this little rarity from the Craft Beer Company in London.  So it cost a fortune.  88 IBU, which is a bit higher than the BrewDog, but slightly lower ABV.

Similar to the BrewDog.

Surprisingly little aroma, boozy with a general maltiness and even some brine.

Taste: For 88 IBU I expected a bit more here.  I found it sweet, lightly fruity and malty, but that’s about it.

Conclusion: It’s difficult not to like a beer this sweet, but I’m not blown away.  I prefer the BrewDog, I think.

In reality I’m really comparing two different sets of beers here.  It isn’t possible to do a direct comparison between two beers, one of which is more than twice as strong as the other, and that’s one of the reasons I’ve chosen not to simply “score” them.  If I were to draw two hypotheses from the above, and these are really just initial thoughts for further investigation, I might say this:

  1. Session-strength Citra pale ales are enjoyable from the bottle, but might well be better and more fuller-bodied from cask.
  2. Stronger IPAs might be better suited to using Citra in addition to other hops, as the experience above suggests it doesn’t, on its own, impart a sophisticated-enough range of flavours with the balance and depth to match the body.

But, as always, I could be wrong, and would appreciate your own thoughts and experiences on the topic.

Categories: Beer Tags: , , , , ,
  1. broadfordbrewer
    August 3, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    Good blog post Nick. I tend to agree with the idea that other hops need to be used, subtly, in order to showcase a particular hop. I seem to remember the guys from Ilkley Brewery being passionate about “propping up” and bringing the best out of your leading hop with small amounts of other varieties. I believe @bgrtrob ‘s Citra King (A Bandwagon Straddling IPA), one I was lucky enough to try, had several other hops in the mix.

    Not tried the Mikeller but have the others and agree that it’s difficult to compare too beers with vastlt different abv. I do regularly drink Fyne Jarl and did enjoy the one bottle of BrewDog Citra I had in the IPAIsDead pack.

    • August 4, 2011 at 12:59 pm

      Cheers David, I really enjoy some IPAs and pale ales that use Citra but the ones I’ve really been struck by have an obvious helping hand from other more robust flavoured hops. That would seem to make sense.

  2. August 4, 2011 at 12:09 am

    I had the Oakham Citra on cask at the Malt Shovel Tavern in Northampton town and it was better than in the bottle, and certainly better than the BrewDog – although I have not tried the Mikkeller or the Fynne Ales. Tough to get here in Canada… Nice to see a side-by-side like this, far more insightful than one off reviews imo.

    • August 4, 2011 at 1:00 pm

      Cheers Dan. I’m going to have to keep an eye out for Oakham beers on cask – I’ve only really seen JHB around here.

  3. August 4, 2011 at 8:39 am

    Another good post Nick! Interesting to hear that the Brewdog was just ‘ok’ as it was, as you mention, truly stunning at the launch night on keg in North Bar.

    • August 4, 2011 at 1:01 pm

      I think it was a bit older, plus the whole bottle/keg thing that you discussed with Zak re O’Dell IPA. It wasn’t my favourite from the launch night though – I think we all had different views!

  4. August 4, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    Good review, and interesting to see the comparison. Just to confirm – Jarl is single hopped with Citra. Cheers. Jamie

    • August 5, 2011 at 11:09 am

      Thanks very much for that Jamie. I’m looking forward to trying it on cask but as we don’t seem to get much Fyne around here, maybe that’ll have to wait for my next trip to Scotland.

  5. Zak
    August 5, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    I like Oakham Citra from bottle. That is all.

  6. August 8, 2011 at 11:06 am

    I think single hopped beers, although interesting in experimentm, tend not to be blanaced in the long term and a variety gives a better beer. Whether this is additional aroma hops, or dry hopping or whatever. Parallels can be drawn between single hop variety beers and single apple variety ciders

  7. John Slack
    December 2, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    Afraid there are no Citra hops in Jarl – according to Mr. Delap. .

  1. August 24, 2011 at 8:19 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: